A friend emailed me an article from the Telegraph today. The Telegraph is not a paper which I personally buy, it's a little too right wing, foreigners are evil, long live the Tories for me. I mean this is the paper that claimed immigrants from EU countries are driving up house prices in the UK. After telling us that the top 10 areas of employment for EU immigrants are in the service industry. See here for the insightful and unbiased article.
"More than one third were factory operatives, 10 per cent packers, nine per cent catering assistants, nine per cent warehouse operatives, followed by cleaners, farm workers, waiters, domestic workers, care assistants and sales assistants"
How many people do you know working in any of those areas that can afford to but houses in the UK market ? But apparently immigration in a major factor in the rise of the average house price from £86,000 to £177,000. Not people buying second homes or property to rent out then.
Back to the point. I checked out the article that I had been emailed. Here it is. Basically, a small number of Muslim medical students are refusing to deal with patients who require treatment for alcohol related illness and sexually transmitted diseases on religious grounds. They also refuse to attend lectures on the subjects. Some are refusing to perform examinations on members of the opposite sex. The Times also has a piece on this. A search at BBC online turned up nothing. Neither did a search at the Guardian online nor at the Independent. I admit I didn't exactly work through every possible combination of search terms but still. Okay I did one search at each using the words Muslim, medical students, doctors, refuse. I thought that would do. Sheesh, people I don't have all day.
I assume that anyone who fails to study any area of medicine for any reason will be unable to pass their exams and therefore I don't really care. You aren't capable of doing the job and you won't qualify. Seems fair to me. What pissed me off was in the Times article. The General Medical Council has "received requests for guidance over whether students could “omit parts of the medical curriculum and yet still be allowed to graduate”".
Eh, let me think, you don't complete the course and as a result can't pass your exam so we should . . . . .consider letting you graduate anyway. Of course ! Why didn't I see it before. So totally logical. To quote a very dear friend, fuck that shit.
I'd have the same opinion of anyone else of any religion in a similar situation. In fact I do. Christan doctors who refuse to refer patients for abortions, or any religious type who refuses to supply any medical procedure/medication etc on religious/moral/ethical grounds consider yourself well and truly off the list of people I like. You know what the job entails, if you can't do it find other employment.
The Times and Telegraph article also mention that Sainsbury's supermarkets allows employees not scan booze at the tills on religious ground, someone else has to be called in to do that. Seems stupid but whatever. Actually, no, not whatever. If you can't fill your job description you shouldn't have the frickin' job.
Apparently this whole I can't do my job for r/m/e reasons is becoming more prevalent. I have an answer. Sack them.
That goes for the doctors who "are unwilling to provide terminations because they believe there is no good excuse for unwanted pregnancies". You see they "don't see why they should have to - as one put it to me - clear up the mess if women can't be bothered to use contraception." The whole article is here. They apparently don't understand that contraceptives can fail. Wow. And these people actually passed their exams ? That's quite disturbing.
You are entitled to what ever beliefs and opinions you want but they should not interfere with your ability to function in your chosen career or job. It's terribly unprofessional.
One other situation that needs mentioned in the I can't do my job properly section. I have friend in the fire brigade who told me that in their whole "equality" drive a female candidate was given a second shot at a test. No male candidate ever has been. If she couldn't pass the test under the same conditions as everyone else then she can't do the job. It's insulting to other candidates, both male and female, who can.
Tuesday, 9 October 2007
Doctors, And Others, Who Can't Do Their Job
Spouted in a silly manner by
Persephone
at
15:29
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

4 comments:
Abso-fucking-lutely!!!!!! You have the most amazing way of putting your finger on the point of a problem my dear!!!
It is completely SHOCKING; HORRIFYING; TERRIFYING AND NUMBING that doctors, those people who took that sacred oath to HELP their patients to the best of their ability, may actually be allowed to determine and decide just which part of the population that oath applies to!!!!!!
What next, refusing to work in the casualty area of a hospital because the patients walking in can't all be guaranteed to be clean????????
AAAARRRRGGGHH!!!!!!!
Beautifully put lass.....I swear everytime I visit this blog I learn something important!!!!!
(Hopefully you're not charging per day for this are you???!?!?!!?!?!?)
xx
No charge for you me dear.
I wish I was half as good as you say but thank you for the complement. I'll feel all smug about it for a while now.
Ego ? What ego ? The one filling the room ? That's nothing, ignore it, it'll go away.
I think if you sign up to be a doc then you sign up to treat who ever comes through your door for what ever reason they need. Especially if you work for the NHS.
While I do think that medical studies need to be uniform for all students to achieve the title of "physician" I do not believe that a physician should have to compromise his or her beliefs for elective procedures. I can have a practice refusing to perform colonoscopies so why is it wrong for a physician to refuse to perform abortions? They are people, not machines and as people that should be able to choose the medicine they wish to perform as long as it isn't a life or death matter that needs immediate attention.
Ducking now. :-)
No need to duck. Promise.
I can see your point but for me if doctors can choose to opt out of procedures or of treating patients for religious/moral/ethical reasons then where do you draw the line ? Also, if you do allow opt outs do ask that in an emergency situation their standpoint is put aside ? Or does the patient in A&E need to wait while the doctor assess whither or not they are prepared to treat them, then possibly wait further for a doctor who will if the assessment is negative ?
I mentioned the abortion issue because in the comments following one of the article about the Muslim students refusal to deal with certain patients/issue someone argued that while the they shouldn't be able to refuse that it was perfectly okay to for others to refuse to refer patients for abortion or to perform them.
I feel it would be discriminatory to pick one religious/moral/ethical standpoint and say that can't interfere with treatment but others can. It has to be applied to all.
Post a Comment